Buyouts 2.0

In an interesting twist, William M. Hartnett of the Palm Beach Post has been Twittering his buyout meeting.

Some highlights:

- No details yet on layoff severance package if buyouts don’t meet job cut goals. Just “less generous.” 9 minutes ago from web
- Guy in front row is staring at the ceiling. 7 minutes ago from web
- Separation pay taxed at normal rate, unless received as lump sum. 13 minutes ago from web
- They’ll be “exited” that day. Sounds menacing. 15 minutes ago from web
- Last day for buyout recipients: Tuesday, Aug. 12 16 minutes ago from web
- Max 52 weeks, for those here more than 26 years. 20 minutes ago from web
- Not quite enough for that yacht I was hoping to get. 22 minutes ago from web
- Two weeks of pay and benefits for every year of service. 23 minutes ago from web

What’s funny about this, and what so many others are doing right now, is that for once everyone has no fear about what they are putting online. The general consensus seems to be, “What are you going to do, fire me?”

More Lee Abrams goodies*

Abrams interview with Jeffrey Goldberg of The Atlantic:

JG: Why were you surprised to find out that your company has reporters based in Iraq?
LA: I was in Los Angeles, sitting in this casual little meeting waiting for someone to show up, and there was this lady who had just got back from four years in Iraq, I forgot her name, I met 300 people in two days, and she was telling me about security problems, bullets in the background and all that, and it really struck me that there should be pictures of her with Iraqi children in the newspaper to show she was there. Whereas in the newspaper, it just says, “Times Staff Reporter.” I really never thought about it, that there was really a person over there going through hell to get this.

Er, no actually. Because then you get the Geraldo Rivera’s and those like him who decide that they themselves want to be the focus of the story. The story is what we should focus on, not the hardships of the reporter who is there. After all, the reporter needs to save something for the tell-all book later. Unless you are doing some sort of Gonzo project, the trials and tribulations of the reporter should be invisible compared to the actual story, especially with Iraq War coverage.

Going to dangerous places to get a story, to inform the people and get the truth; that’s the reporter’s job. When we watch a movie, we don’t expect the actor to stop, turn to the camera and tell us how hard it was to shoot this shot or get this scene. They save that for ‘behind-the-scenes’ specials and E! News pieces, but doing so in the middle of the film would distract from…say it together kids…THE STORY.

Continuing…

JG: It didn’t strike you that there were employees of the newspaper over there doing this work?
LA: It was just ink to me, just reading. Oh yeah, here’s what’s happening in Iraq, but then I didn’t feel the human side.
JG: So more first-person in the papers, then?
LA: I would have loved to see diaries, because what she was telling me was fascinating, living in these special secured floors of the Baghdad Hotel. It was like theater of the mind.

The human side? The Iraqis dying, the American soldiers in Iraq and the numerous other American contractors in the Middle East and you can’t see the human side? Yeah, the harrowing tale of the reporter having to take THE STAIRS to the roof of the hotel to get a signal on their satellite modem in order to file their story ON DEADLINE, that’s the real human side. The horror…the horror.

I will say this about Mr. Abrams, he is incredibly ENTHUSIASTIC!

*Note: I wouldn’t normally say critical stuff of my employer but seeing that I am leaving soon, what’s the harm (knock on wood).

Dan Rather: ‘American Journalism is in a Crisis’

In a short commentary in AdBusters Dan Rather, former anchor of CBS Evening News and broadcast journalism icon, had some terse words for American journalism and the “international conglomerates” that own it:

I believe the American people want to stand up to political pressure and say, “Report the news the way we want you to report it and if you don’t, you will be made to pay a price.” It has led to a situation where the red beating heart of a representative democracy, a free press, is run by large multinational conglomerates. They work in myriad ways, particularly in secrecy, and their influence is far too great in newsrooms.

Be that as it may, I think Dan is a bit bitter.

Columbia, CUNY get cash for new media programs

From SPJ’s Classrooms & Newsrooms:

The graduate journalism schools at Columbia University and the City University of New York will improve their new-media programs with a total of $8-million in grants from the Tow Foundation, the charity announced today.

Columbia will receive $5-million, and CUNY $3-million. Under the terms of the grants, Columbia must garner an additional $10-million in donations within 18 months, and CUNY must raise enough to double its grant. Leonard Tow, a co-founder of the foundation, said the grants were a response to his “serious concerns about what is happening in the world of journalism.”

While I think it is great that programs like those at Columbia and CUNY (home of Jeff Jarvis) are receiving donor funds for new media programs, I am also disheartened that it is only these elite programs that seem to receive these influxes of cash (if I’m wrong someone show me some links). Not everyone can afford to go to Columbia, NYU or CUNY.

Furthermore, why only graduate programs? Aren’t undergrad journalism programs just as deserving of money toward teaching new media as grad programs? To that one might say that undergrad programs teach the fundamentals and grad programs are where you learn more advanced journalism skills. Well, that’s debatable. Looking at the course descriptions at both Columbia and CUNY for their M.A. programs, many of the courses are basics (reporting I, editing I, ethics, law).

While I understand that many people who go to a graduate-level J-school have undergrad degrees in other disciplines, what about us folks that want to continue our journalism education but already have a B.A. in journalism? Why force us to repeat and basically negate what we spent four years earning?

OK, sorry for the journalism education rant. My point is that funding for new media and new media education should not be exclusive for graduate programs, especially the elite graduate programs. Some of the best journalists in history, and some great ones I know personally, went to smaller and less well-known schools. I imagine this is an issue across many majors and not relegated strictly to journalism but hey, I’m speaking to what I know about.

Point blank: More money for journalism schools! Eh, in a perfect world right?

[/END JOURNALISM RANT]

Newsrooms may be cutting staff, but online jobs seem to be everywhere

A few days ago my superior/colleague (though not for long) Danny Sanchez posted about some open job positions in the journalism world. With all of the talk about newsroom cutbacks and staff layoffs it is refreshing, and I imagine comforting to those just coming out of j-school, to see that there are in fact still jobs out there for the talented, intrepid and somewhat lucky job seekers.

So, I figured I’d follow his lead and post a list of jobs that are squarely focused in the online world. The market seems to be more welcoming right now to the Web journalists and I think it would behoove people to know what is out there.

Oh, a note to the non-believers and/or purists out there. Not all journalism jobs need be for newspapers (Slate, ProPublica, Yahoo!, etc.)

See, there are plenty of jobs out there and this isn’t even all of them. Keep on looking people and never stop polishing those skills.

Other suggestions:

  • Go to recruiting conventions or journalism job fairs. Don’t bother with the non-industry specific job fair cattle calls, they’re probably a waste of time.
  • Tighten up that resume and hone those interviewing skills (job interviewing skills, not the journalism ones). Let your resume give the person hiring just enough so that they want to sit down and talk with you.
  • When applying, write a cover letter catered to that specific job and/or organization. Nothing says lazy like a form cover letter.
  • Seminars are a great place to meet people and get your face and work known. You never know when you might be sitting down in front of them and interviewing.
  • Network, network, network!

Good night, and good luck.

NY Times goes social, slighly endorses Firefox over IE

The New York Times has added a social feature to its site called TimesPeople (beta). While not a full-fledged social network, the new feature allows people to create a profile, add friends and share articles.

Its most clever ability is its interaction with social-networking behemoth Facebook. Users can connect it with an NYT Facebook application and when articles are tagged, they show up in their FB newsfeed. As the engineer in the video puts it, “this let’s people who normally wouldn’t be reading the New York Times see and read articles that they might find interesting.”

Again the NYT does it right. They created a new feature, not as an add platform or simply a revenue booster, but as a way to draw more people into the NYT Web site and get their content into the wild. Kudos.

EDIT: Oops, I kind of left this point out.

Right now the app seems to be Firefox exclusive, which may have been an intentional F.U. from the engineers to Microsoft, or it may just be because it is still in beta. Still, I thought that was an interesting choice considering IE still has a larger portion of the Web browser market share (though it is slipping more and more every day.)

So it begins: OC Register to outsource copy editing to India

From Doug Fisher and Media Bistro, apparently the Orange County Register is going to start a pilot program where they will outsource their copy-editing duties to India.

To me this is simply a tragedy. There are those that feel copy editing is the most mechanical of all of the journalism duties in the newsroom, fixing grammar and running spell check on stories. This couldn’t be further from the truth. Copy editors have to know almost more than the reporters so that they not only know when something is wrong, logically and semantically as well as grammatically, so that they know when to ask questions. AP Style, grammar and spelling can be taught sure, but not pop culture references, idioms or other forms of expression that are uniquely American.

From a writing perspective, a copy editor’s job is to make the writer look better. When someone reads a story they don’t look at it and lavish praise or criticism on the copy editor, the name on the byline is the sole person responsible in their mind. When that editor becomes someone that is totally disconnected from the writer, both culturally and by proximity, that disconnection will show itself in the stories. They too will be mechanical and stale.

Outsourcing copy-editing duties may save the paper money, but at what cost? Thomas L. Friedman, I blame you and your ‘The World is Flat’ thinking. Globalization is not necessarily a good thing.

Newman

More photos.

Off topic post, but I figured I’d share some photos of my old dog. I had to say my final farewell to the fella since I am moving to Minneapolis and he is staying in Florida with his mom. I’m going to miss the little guy, even though I rarely see him.

A new dog is on the horizon as soon I can know that I have the time for it. According to my book, over a third of the Twin Cities population are dog owners.

OK, back to our regularly scheduled journalism drivel.

Online Journalism Review to cease publication

Yup, the OJR is going to stop the publication of it’s Web site. From Robert Niles in the final post:

This is the final post at OJR. After a decade, the University of Southern California’s Annenberg School for Communication has decided to cease publication of the website. The archives will remain online, but there will be no new articles.

One of OJR’s goals over the years has been to help mid-career journalists make a successful transition from other media to online reporting and production. I’m pleased to say that USC Annenberg will continue to provide support in that area, through the Knight Digital Media Center. I encourage OJR readers to click over to the KDMC website and its blogs, if you are not already a regular reader there.

The decision to close OJR means that I have left the University of Southern California. But I am not going offline. I will continue to write, daily, about new media and journalism at my new website, SensibleTalk.com. I hope that many of you will click over and visit me there.

That’s a shame, I really liked OJR. Niles and his cohorts posed some interesting questions and had some great discussions on their site. I also liked the network and group feel of the site. It made you feel like you were a part of something.

But, the show must go on, as the cliché goes. Thankfully Niles will continue to blog on his own site so we online journalism geeks won’t be without his wise words and inquiries.

Video web design tutorials

Want to learn some basic Web design stuff but don’t feel like slogging through a book or taking a community college class? Here are a whole gaggle (well 10 actually) of video tutorials someone linked on Mashable covering everything from basic HTML to CSS and even some PHP and other scripting languages. Check it out.

Oh, and I have no idea what is up with the picture of Tony “Gazelle” Little.

Meet the Press

(L-R) Democratic strategist James Carville and his wife Republican strategist Mary Matalin burst into tears during a taping of “Meet the Press” in memory of the late moderator Tim Russert. (Alex Wong/Getty Images for Meet the Press)

While I think MSNBC is going a bit overboard with their coverage and engaging in a fair amount of navel gazing, this is a powerful picture.

Biased or not biased, that is the question

The current issue of the American Journalism Review has an excellent article by Washington Post reporter Paul Farhi analyzing the charges of media bias in our current political campaign and in general. I urge you to read the full article, but one portion stood out to me:

The public doesn’t really understand how the news is made.

That might sound elitist, except that much of the daily suspicion cast on reporters’ work seems to stem from naïveté and reflexive public cynicism. Ask journalists about a recent accusation of bias and watch their eyes begin to roll. Julie Mason, the Houston Chronicle’s White House reporter, remembers one reader who took her to task for being “obsessed” with John Kerry during the 2004 campaign. Obsessed? She was covering his campaign. “It was my job to be with him every day,” she laughs.

Another reader spotted bias in the placement of quotes in one of Mason’s stories. “I’m biased,” she says, “because I put the quote in after the jump, which to them means I’m trying to bury it. They don’t believe you when you say you don’t control where a story jumped.”

| FULL ARTICLE |

I think that this notion is an essential truth right now and a reason why so many people feel that media is biased. The public seem to have this grim notion that all of the reporters, editors and the rest of the people that make the news sit around and conjure up evil machinations on how they can destroy, exploit and make money.

One of the more interesting charges comes when people accuse the media of using a particular, sensationalist article to increase circulation and readership, and thus, increasing salaries. As if there is a direct correlation between a reporter’s pay and how much attention one article receives. It’s not the stock market, it’s a newsroom.

These charges and the current misunderstanding of how the news is made reinforces the need to create a more transparent newsroom, something the Internet can handle far better than ‘Letters to the Editor’ or an ombudsman.

Increasingly newsrooms are doing Q & A sessions online with newsroom staff (i.e. NY Times, Dallas Morning News) and projects like the above-mentioned newsroom.

There’s that tired adage about not wanting to know how the sausage is made, but in our industry, I think it’s high time we started letting people check out the ingredients. If not just for them, but also for us.

Ira Glass on storytelling


Ira Glass, host of NPR’s This American Life, explaining his take on storytelling. I think a lot of this can be appropriated to how we need to start telling stories online, be it by video, audio or just in words.

Now, this isn’t a cure-all template that can and will always work, but it’s a good way of thinking when it comes to good storytelling. If anything, if you are a big fan of TAL but don’t really know why, this sort of explains it.