Via CyberJournalist.net:
Oof.
Tara Hunt over at HorsePigCow has a great post called Tweeting for Companies 101. Her thoughts:
Twitter can be an amazingly powerful platform for connecting to your community as well as driving traffic to the various properties you want people to go. Having an event? Tweet it out! Launched a new bag? Tweet it out!
The key to Twitter is the level of listening you do as well as talking. It is definitely supposed to be an interactive program. And, in fact, this is where you build the majority of your Whuffie (aka social capital). The more you interact on Twitter, the more people will interact with you, which attracts others to you as well.
Though meant to be directed toward marketing companies and similar institutions, there’s no reason some of her tips can’t be appropriated for use by the journalism business. Considering the forced marriage between the two it seems more than appropriate actually. Hunt lists some corporate examples from JetBlue and Zappos and then gives a laundry list of potential uses for the microblogging platform. She also offers the advice in a handy PDF, so maybe you can print it out and unplug for a little while instead of just staying at the computer during your lunch break.
Check it out.
Oh, and be sure to also read colleague and Orlando Sentinel business/tech journalist Etan Horowitz’s post on why journalists should use Twitter.
In an effort to tap into that ever volatile youth demographic, MSNBC has launched a MySpace page called Decision 08. Showing their age and how behind the times they are, doesn’t MSNBC know that MySpace is sooo yesterday’s news. Everyone knows that Facebook is the where it’s at with kids today.
Though I do have to hand it to them for being able to mask as much as possible that it is, in fact, a MySpace page. It almost looks like a standalone Web site, save for the always brilliant, exclamation point-laden comments at the bottom that are typical of MySpace groupies.
I wonder if MSNBC realizes that MySpace is owned by rival media conglomerate News Corp. Kind of sleeping with the enemy aren’t they?
Randi Rhodes, progressive radio talk show host for Air America, has resigned due to comments she made about presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. She apparently called Hillary a f**king whore and it was all caught on tape and put up on the great equalizer, YouTube (Warning! Some foul language).
Mark Green, president of Air America Media, told FOXNews.com that Rhodes terminated her contract Wednesday after she refused to apologize on air for her remarks.
“We sought an apology, because of what she had said…like Imus, like David Shuster,” Green said. “She refused and instead last night informed us she was terminating her contract with Air America, which she has the option to do.”
He said she was not forced out — “She exercised her option.”
The Internet takes down yet another radio personality. The reason this is somewhat justifiable is that the radio station was sponsoring the event, so Rhodes was held accountable for her comments. Again, though I am all about the First Amendment, we are representatives of our media organizations and must be conscious of our words.
This raises that questions though, when a radio station hires a polarizing figure for a public position, should they be punished for being offensive and/or polarizing? (i.e. Howard Stern, Will Kristol, Imus, Limbaugh).
Yeah, yeah, more readings.
Diebold Accidentally Leaks Results Of 2008 Election Early
Sorry, just thought we all could use a little injection of humor. This comes after reading a profile piece on The Onion by Virginia Heffernan in the NY Times. Best quote:
“If you can’t trust your shadowy overlords to keep a secret, what is the purpose of voting in a puppet democracy?”
Awesome. Back to your regularly scheduled program.
Today in the world of online journalism (and beyond):
There you have it. Carry on.
Read anything interesting today?
Paul Bradshaw over at the Online Journalism Blog has written an excruciatingly long, yet incredibly informative, post about RSS, social media and what he calls ‘Passive-Agressive Newsgathering.’ In it, he breaks down RSS (syndicated content) and compares and contrasts it to its social networking equivalent. He even broke it down into a diagram:
He breaks down each element and what they mean for a journalist. The post is full of links, both outside OJB and within, and is a good primer for those not yet familiar with how all of these new tools can help a journalist. It is also a good read for the seasoned online journo as a refresher course.
Check it out, get comfortable and be ready to feel like you haven’t been using all of the pieces of your toolbox. Nice work Paul.
From Editor & Publisher:
NYTimes.com — 18,869 –30%
USATODAY.com — 10,709 — (-2%)
washingtonpost.com — 8,929 — 13%
Wall Street Journal Online — 6,850 — 99%
LA Times — 5,729 — 22%New York Post — 4,677 — 31%
Boston.com — 4,184 — (-1%)
Chicago Tribune — 3,825 — 31%
SFGate.com/San Francisco Chronicle — 3,793 — (-10%)
Daily News Online Edition — 3,314 — 54%Newsday — 3,240 — 44%
Village Voice Media — 2,814 — 139%
DallasNews.com – The Dallas Morning News — 2,727 — 96%
The Houston Chronicle — 2,690 — (-26%)
International Herald Tribune — 2,587 — 33%Atlanta Journal-Constitution — 2,384 — 28%
Chicago Sun-Times — 2,206 — 8%
The Politico — 2,095 — 58%
Azcentral.com — 2,016 — (-4%)
Seattle Post-Intelligencer — 1,967 — (-8%)tampabay.com — 1,908 — 6%
Star Tribune — 1,763 — 18%
MercuryNews.com — 1,662 — 36%
Orlando Sentinel — 1,642 — (-31%)
Philly.com — 1,554 — (-12%)Sun-Sentinel — 1,524 — (-9%)
Detroit Free Press — 1,484 — 38%
Cleveland.com — 1,460 — 89%
MiamiHerald.com — 1,451 — (-17%)
The San Diego Union-Tribune — 1,432 — (-19%)
W00t!
The New York Times has a pretty hard-hitting article today by David Barstow about how the Pentagon and the Bush administration used military analysts in a campaign to generate favorable news coverage of the administration’s wartime performance.
Politics aside, the interactive feature included with the story really brings what could be a confusing and convoluted story and turns it into a coherent narrative. Using a combination of stock video from media outlets, animated graphics and an audio narrative, the story is told in a short, three-act structure. They almost follow a movie’s three-act structure, an impressive feat in just 12 minutes of content. Though it does bog down in the middle (they needed a love interest or something), it does keep you engaged and you want to watch all three pieces.
Also of note is the ‘Document Archive’ item at the bottom. It’s self-explanatory but it is a nice addition to the story, especially the copies of the memos and transcripts the article references. All are viewable in the Flash window or you can download them as PDFs.
An impressive package all around.
Now, a bit of a disclaimer. I’m going to try and stray away from the big three (or four) papers when looking at these interactive features from now on. It’s no surprise that the New York Times, Washington Post, USA Today and LA Times can churn out great interactive packages when they have a lot more resources than most. So, in the future, I’m going to try and be a little more intrepid and seek out features that smaller and lesser known news organizations are doing. Sometimes the best stuff comes out of where you would least expect it.
CREDITS: David Barstow, Gabriel Dance, Michele Monteleone, Amy O’Leary/The New York Times
It seems that Twitter has coupled with mobile answer service ChaCha to bring your…TwitterChas! OK, maybe not.
But, Twitter users can now follow ChaCha and, when they send a question @ChaCha, a few minutes later you get an answer back. Interesting, to say the least. I tested it out with these gems.
ME: Who is the governor of Florida?
ChaCha (about 20 seconds later): Florida’s 44th Governor is Republican Charlie Crist.
ME: What is the capital of Wisconsin?
ChaCha (it took a while longer, no one cares about Wisconsin): The capital of Wisconsin is Madison pop. 208054 (2000 US census). — And it pointed me here, which gives additional info and their source site.
Then I tried to get a little tricky on the Mr. ChaCha and his Latin-dancing ways with this question.
ME: Who won the best actor oscar in 1988?
ChaCha (processing…processing…processing…): Dustin Hoffman won the Best Actor Oscar for Rain Man (1988). — It returned this about a minute later.
So, what use would this have to the intrepid mobile journalist? Well, if you set your cellphone up to send and receive Twitter updates, you could easily check simple facts or get an answer to simple questions while out in the field, even if you are sans laptop and/or Wi-Fi connection. Seems pretty useful as long as you can sift through ChaCha’s possibly ambiguous answers.
Or, you could just use it to cheat at Trivial Pursuit, it’s your choice. I think it’s pretty cool though, so check it out.
Guest lineup for the Sunday TV news shows:
———
ABC’s “This Week” — Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz.
———
CBS’ “Face the Nation” — Sen. Bob Casey, D-Pa., and Gov. Ed Rendell, D-Pa.
———
NBC’s “Meet the Press” — David Axelrod, campaign adviser for Barack Obama; Geoff Garin, campaign adviser for Hillary Rodham Clinton.
———
CNN’s “Late Edition” — Former presidential candidate Bill Bradley; Gov. Jon Corzine, D-N.J.; Philadelphia Mayor Michael Nutter; Rep. Chaka Fattah, D-Pa.; Catholic University President David O’Connell; Delia Gallagher, Vatican analyst; Carly Fiorina, adviser to McCain.
———
“Fox News Sunday” — Sens. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., and Charles Schumer, D-N.Y.
*I know these aren’t related to my normal subject matter anymore, but I’ve been posting these for close to a year now, so it’s just habit and I’m sticking to it.
I’ve had a hell of time trying to fix my comment problem, which appears to be something in the .php of this theme. I refuse to give up this theme, however, and I will fix it. The good thing is that right now I get very few comments, so it doesn’t matter.
Because I’ve spent half the night trying to fix it, to no avail, all I’ve got are some meaty links for now
Yeah, it’s cheap to just post a link farm but it’s what I’ve got for now.
Oh, and as an aside, the venerable Mindy McAdams was at my very own (well, not mine per se) Orlando Sentinel doing trainging on blogging and audio. I missed it unfortunately, but by the looks of the outlines it looked like a good time.
In a story pseudo-related to what I was talking about earlier, a staffer from the Washington Post was fired after some profanity-laced statements he made on sports blog. The problem, however, wasn’t so much what the staffer, identified as Michael Tunison, said, but that he associated himself with the ‘Post’ when he did it.
Michael Tunison, who blogged under the name “Christmas Ape” at the “Kissing Suzy Kolber” site, wrote on Wednesday that he had been fired for “bringing discredit to the paper.”
Executive Editor Leonard Downie Jr. confirmed that Tunison no longer worked at the paper and had left his job on Wednesday, but would not specify if he resigned or was fired. “We don’t discuss personnel matters, but we have standards for people’s outside work,” Downie told E&P. “You need to clear it with your editors here before and it should not be a conflict of interest.”
I am inclined to side with the Washington Post on this incident. Even though Tunison was only an editorial aide, any postings he made while associating himself with the paper hurts the integrity of the paper as a whole.
Does this mean that journalists shouldn’t be able to blog in their off time? Certainly not, but there is some personal responsibility you have to take when it comes to what you post on the Internet. I go with the Golden Rule when it comes to posting.
If you put it on the Internet, it will be seen. If you don’t want someone to see it, don’t hit ‘publish.’ In addition, if you are going to post something possibly inflammatory or negative about your employer, don’t identify yourself as an employee of said place. If you do, you are just asking for it.
I also, on this blog and those I have had in the past, always include a personal disclaimer that states that what I post here is my opinion and mine alone and in no way reflects the opinions or thoughts of my employer.
So to use the tired, and albeit edited cliché, blogger beware.